Hi Andre, I'm not Ernst but I hope you won't mind me chipping in with a comment here. It's easy to explain why there can be varying amounts of "chromatic abberation" and "vignetting" with different digital sensors. I put those terms in quotes because in digital capture they have different causes than their counterparts in film-based shooting. The physical construction of the sensor sites, and most relevantly the depth of the sensor site wells in the surface of the silicon, can influence the way the response of the sensor changes with the angle of incidence of incoming light rays. In the case of many wide-angle lens designs, light striking the edges of the frame can travel at a fairly oblique angle, and if these lenses are combined with a sensor that is very susceptible to the direction of the incoming rays, then you will get more noticeable light falloff in the image. The amount of colour fringing can be influenced by the sensor construction and the type of anti-aliasing filter used. Although this effect is not strictly the same thing as chromatic abberation, it appears similar and the terms are often used interchangeably. The one I'm more sceptical about is geometrical distortion. Any sensor will be very nearly perfect in terms of rectilinearity (and flatness, come to that) so distortion and focus plane issues should disappear in the digital capture world. HTH -= mike =- -----Original Message----- From: Andre Sent: 18 November 2004 21:46 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Canon 1Ds MK II --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Ernst Dinkla <E.Dinkla@c...> wrote: > Andre wrote: > The German Magazine Color Foto is probably one of the first that > published test results of the same lenses on different sensor types. > > Ernst So Ernst, what's your take on the body lens relationship ? Are those results disputable or should they be taken into consideration ? Andre ============================================================================== This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this message was misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. CSFB retains and monitors electronic communications sent through its network. Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on CSFB until they are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not guaranteed to be secure. ==============================================================================
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Canon 1Ds MK II
2004-11-22 by Nunan, Mike
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.