--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, The Wogster <wogsterca@y...> wrote:> So we need a > storage method that either uses more stable dyes, or a completely > dye-less process. The problem with this whole discussion is that it focusses on the technology - whether it's dyes, file formats, magnetic -vs- optical, holographic -vs- linear, etc. I'm going to guess that 95% of the people in this forum are geeks and nerds of one sort or another (I'm a hw/sw engineer), and human nature is a common geek/nerd blind spot. But the PROBLEM isn't TECHNOlogical, it's PSYCHOlogical. It has little to do with technology and lots to do with human nature. Any archival solution that depends on active maintenance or intervention on a regular basis will fail because someone will lose interest or forget or will hand off a shoebox to someone without telling them they have to update it every once in awhile, or they won't have the technical skill, or they will dutifully DO the conversion but there will be a bug in the conversion program that no one will realize until 10 years later when someone else tries to do the NEXT conversion, or they will guess wrong about what the next standard format will be and convert it to something dead-end. Christer thinks someone will be "in charge" of doing this stuff. But we're talking FAMILIES here, not banks or hospitals or government agencies where there are specialists and bureaucrats to be in charge of things. NO ONE will be in charge. Someone will inherit an old trunk with lots of memorabilia and it will get broken up and distributed and stashed away and moved around.
Message
[Digital BW] Re: how many REALLY do store digital copies elsewhere
2004-11-24 by Peter Nelson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.