Think about if you really need to scan a 4x5 neg at 4800 dpi. Are you making billboard sized prints that people will view up close? Just figure out what rez you need to scan 4x5 at to yeild your max print size at 360 dpi. I bet you'll find that any scan more than 1200 dpi gets downsized in the printer driver anyway. Then you have a reasonable file size that you can work quickly and no impact on print quality. Bob Michaels --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Wensing <wensing@s...> wrote: > I scan in 4x5 negatives at 4800 dpi, 16-bit grayscale, > and am having a tough (read: slow) time of it with > Photoshop 6.0 with the resulting files. Actually, I > can't even work with the 50-90 mg .jpeg's, but instead > downsize to roughly 12 megapixels and then > dodge/burn/tweak those. Does anyone here work with > digital files around 50-90 megs in Photoshop that is > happy with the quickness of their setup in doing so? > Right now, with the machine I have, manipulating such > files is impossible. > > My machine is an Athlon XP 1.46 Ghz with 1 gig of DDR > RAM. Two possible bottlenecks from what I know are > memory bus speed (333 Mhz with my current motherboard) > and also the version of PS I'm using. CS might be > faster from the get-go? > > Thanks in advance, > > Matt > > ===== > E-mail: wensing@s... > Blog: <http://seaofglass.blogspot.com> > Photography: <http://www.wensing-photo.com>
Message
Re: Computing power
2004-12-02 by Bob Michaels
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.