>If you scan at a reduced resolution eg. 1200ppi instead of 4800ppi (assuming >that is the optical resolution), your scanner simply throws away >three-quarters of the detail in your film, leaving you with just one-quarter >of the original detail. I thought that ppi in the scan was relevant in determining the amount of "detail" in the print but that detail in the scan was a function of the scanner's optics and mechanics, not the ppi setting. I would expect to lose detail in the print if for example I scan a 4x5 negative at 300 ppi and then make a 16x20 print but I never thought that if the scanner is capable of say 4800 ppi and I scan at 1200 ppi I've necessarily lost three quarters of the "original detail" in the negative regardless of the size at which I print. Or stated another way, I would have thought I could scan the 4x5 negative at say 720 ppi with a 4800 ppi scanner and make a 4x5 print that has as much detail as the scanner, printer, and paper are capable of producing, i.e. that I wouldn't lose most of the detail in the negative by doing that. "Printer drivers vary but probably you don't need to help it resample by scanning larger than is reasonable. The (maximum ppi) will consume vast amounts of memory for no good reason. . . So this article might make us ponder why it is that we think we must routinely scan a photograph at (maximum ppi)? We can't show that size on our monitor. Our printers cannot print that much resolution. The photograph doesn't have that much detail anyway. Our memory size doesn't tolerate it and our disk space hurts too. It must be a macho thing to do it." Fulton, "A Few Scanning Tips," pp. 49 & 54. However, I'm certainly open to being corrected, I don't claim to be an expert. I just haven't before heard that the scan (as opposed to the print) loses detail as the ppi is reduced below the maximum of which the scanner is capable. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Frost" <bob@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 3:24 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Computing power B, For best results you should scan at the optical resolution of your scanner, and then reduce the file size/ppi in Photoshop if you need to reduce it. If you scan at a reduced resolution eg. 1200ppi instead of 4800ppi (assuming that is the optical resolution), your scanner simply throws away three-quarters of the detail in your film, leaving you with just one-quarter of the original detail. If on the other hand, you scan at 4800ppi and then reduce to 1200ppi in Photoshop, PS doesn't simply throw away three-quarters of the detail, it effectively 'averages' the 4800ppi detail to provide you with a new 1200ppi image that more accurately reflects the original than just throwing pixels away. Bob Frost. ----- Original Message ----- From: "B. Campbell" <bellis60@...> >Not much point in shooting larger formats if you plan to scan them at >such low resolution that they produce the same size files as smaller >formats. Sure there is. If I did my job my larger negative contains better detail and tonal range than a smaller negative. I don't lose that detail and range by scanning for a file size that produces the maximum dpi my printer driver will allow at the largest print size it will make and/or that I want or need. In other words, there's Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Computing power
2004-12-06 by B. Campbell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.