Digital BW, The Print

Roger Howard writes:

> Of course, probably all the same old exploits probably exist with
> JPEG2000... someone must have a Windows plugin that will happily 
> execute arbitrary code in a JPEG2000 file, but that's not part of the 
> spec.

And probably most of the JPEG2000 libraries are built without buffer
length checks.  (But this is also a compiler problem, not just a
programming problem.)