Steve, I think you and Tyler are at an impass. You believe that the absolute value (of brightness) matters. Tyler believes that everything is relative. In terms of "the literature", Tyler is right. The commonly held belief is that the absolute value of brightness doesn't matter. That the human vision system will adapt to the scenes or images dynamic range. See "Digital Image Processing", by William K. Pratt or similar works for a complete discussion of why this is. I'm more of a relativist, too. The curves I create are visually linear from paper-white to ink-black with middle grey falling where it may. But this discussion has made me reconsider this approach and question my assumptions. Or, at least made me consider an alternative: I'm going to create some curves that put printed middle-grey at Kodak middle grey, but that also make my displayed contrast equal my printed contrast. Let the S-curve fall where it may! Really, there is no right or wrong here. It's just how you choose to work. -Keith At 04:24 AM 12/7/2004, you wrote: >Hi Tyler and others following along > >No maths, just managing image tones to print tones - what a B&W RIP is all >about. > >With regard to LAB - you sold me. Even as a (final) edit tool. In a colour <snip>
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Tonal range and linearization
2004-12-07 by Keith Douglas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.