Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Tonal range and linearization

2004-12-07 by Roy Harrington

> 
> I hope you will persevere with me on this and I hope people like Roy are
> listening in.
> 
> Like that LAB!
> 
> Steve
> 

Hi Steve,

I've actually been following the thread all along and it sure has sparked a
lot of interesting questions.

I like comparing things and linearizing in Lab because it's supposed to the ideal
match for human vision.  I.e. linear Lab ought to be linear visually -- in other
words a difference from Lab 15 to 20 (5%) is comparable to a difference from
Lab 50 to 55 (also 5%) and Lab 85 to 90.  This makes sense as the best use of
the 256 values you get for an 8bit data file.

Unfortunately Photoshop doesn't have a Lab oriented grayspace.  We could use
Lab spaces but first they have 3 channels so your files will be triple the size with
no more info.  Second I think when you print, PS will get you "out of Lab" in the
conversion to grayscale doing a profile mapping for you (or is it to you :) ).

The main reason I've always used gray gamma 2.2 along with adobe RGB is that
with the eye dropper you can see the 8 bit values in the file.  K gives only 0-100
but underneath its really 0-255. You can see 0-255 in the RGB values but they
are only correct if the gray and color spaces have the same gamma. (Profile
conversions are always going on).


Roy

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.