Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Spotting Prints

2004-12-16 by Steve Kale

Ernst

I am not sure I understand this:  what doesn't work?  What is the difference
between trying to match a step vs a direct patch measured from the problem
area (either lassoed or eye-dropped)?  (The reason why I am being persistent
is because the step approach doesn't work for colour images.)

Steve



> From: Ernst Dinkla <E.Dinkla@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:19:59 +0100
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Spotting Prints
> 
> 
> Nick H. Nugent wrote:
>> 
>> This is an excellent tip. I always fumbled around trying to create a
>> match but this is the best technique yet. But isn't it easier
>> to "lasso" the areas that have specs and print them onto the glossy
>> paper as your spotting palette? This way you will have an exact
>> match, well almost.
>> 
>> --nick
> 
> Have done that for spotting color prints and it doesn't work.
> The way the inkjet heads put down a color is different to mixing
> the same ink with a brush and applying it. It may work for quad
> inks but I think you better use the wedge as that gives you a
> wider range of greys to spot with.
> 
> Prefer the drawing pens filled with inkjet inks though.
> 
> Ernst
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.