Ernst I am not sure I understand this: what doesn't work? What is the difference between trying to match a step vs a direct patch measured from the problem area (either lassoed or eye-dropped)? (The reason why I am being persistent is because the step approach doesn't work for colour images.) Steve > From: Ernst Dinkla <E.Dinkla@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:19:59 +0100 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Spotting Prints > > > Nick H. Nugent wrote: >> >> This is an excellent tip. I always fumbled around trying to create a >> match but this is the best technique yet. But isn't it easier >> to "lasso" the areas that have specs and print them onto the glossy >> paper as your spotting palette? This way you will have an exact >> match, well almost. >> >> --nick > > Have done that for spotting color prints and it doesn't work. > The way the inkjet heads put down a color is different to mixing > the same ink with a brush and applying it. It may work for quad > inks but I think you better use the wedge as that gives you a > wider range of greys to spot with. > > Prefer the drawing pens filled with inkjet inks though. > > Ernst >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Spotting Prints
2004-12-16 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.