Digital BW, The Print

Tim Atherton wrote:

> > Is it
> > just EAM without the watermarks, and with reduced liability regarding
> > implying EAM is an archival substrate,
>
> > Todd
>
> I doubt it -the term "archival" is actually meaningless in Conservation
> terms - it can mean anything the manufacturer of (insert here - paper, CD's,
> picture matts etc) wants it to mean.
>
> tim a
>

If there weren't a legal ramification to the word 'archival', I doubt that Epson would be changing the name.

Harvey Ferdschneider
partner, SKID Photography, NYC





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]