Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: if wishes were horses...advice?

2004-12-31 by scott_now_coming

Strickly B&W? No bigger than 13x19" prints?

The 1280/90 is a no-brainer.

If I had known (seen with my own eyes) how good my C86 and MIS EZN 
inks were ahead of time, I would have gone ahead and bought the 1290.

It prints as big as the 2200 but cost only about half as much.

Now, I need to find someone with a Costco membership to get some 
Kirkland....!

Good luck,

Scott


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Djon" 
<westsidemaurice@y...> wrote:
> 
> I'm happy as a clam with my 2200 for color and non-critical B&W (I 
do
> get decent neutrals)...but I want a purely B&W printer as well and I
> have barely enough table space for the purpose.
> 
> So, how would YOU start fresh, using somebody's B&W inkset and not
> planning on bigger than 13X19? 
> 
> Is there anything better than the 1280/1290 for the purpose? Any
> advantage to a B&W-dedicated 2200? 
> 
> Maybe I should wait until the 2200 replacement model hits, then
> dedicate the current one to B&W?
> 
> What additional technology would you suggest (applications, CIS,
> electronics, dyes...)?

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.