Digital BW, The Print

Hello Peter,
I don¹t want to imply that LIBUSB is problematic,  it isn¹t it¹s very
stable. It sometimes likes be installed while no USB devices are running,.
I¹ve never seen a problem with it.

If your printer on XP is connected over Ethernet with a USB link, the
current version of OPM won¹t see it.  OPM 1.0.0 will only work with a USB
printer either directly connected or on a hub.

Joe 



On 1/5/05 2:08 AM, "Peter Marshall" <petermarshall@...> wrote:

> Joe,
> 
> My rather tentative conclusion was based just on a single machine, but
> your answer does suggest that LIBUSB is rather hardware-sensitive, at
> least on W2000.
> 
> Again my comment on XP was also based on a sample of one machine of the
> two I have running XP, and LIBUSB installed without any problem. It is
> however a machine with less USB devices connected - one of my next jobs
> is to move a printer there (or buy a new one), as I'd forgotten the USB
> printer I use from this machine is actually installed elsewhere on the
> network. XP prints to it without problems over a 100Mbps link, but
> IJC/OPM can't see it.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Peter
> 
> Joe Berndt wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > 
>> > We haven't fully tested on 2000 or 2000pro yet.
>> > 
>> > I haven't run into the same problems with LIBUSB under 2000pro.   We have
>> > other issues that we¹re fixing, but not related to LIBUSB.  I do know that
>> > LIBUSB is sensitive to running USB devices during install.  If you want to
>> > try, remove all USB devices prior to installing LIBUSB.
>> > 
>> > Joe
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On 1/4/05 2:44 PM, "Peter Marshall" <petermarshall@...> wrote:
>> > 
>> > 
>>> >>joejx8 wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>>> >>>>- Does IJC/OPM works on windows 2000 too ?
>>> >>
>>> >>It requires you to install libusb-win32-filter-bin-0.1.8.0 which
>>> >>reliably crashes my W2000 Pro system both on install and use, so I think
>>> >>you are likely to need an XP system with a directly attached USB printer.
>>> >>
>>> >>libusb-win32 is supposed to run on 2000, but it looks as if it isn't
>>> >>being tested on it. However perhaps Joe Berndt will have more reliable
>>> >>information.
>>> >>
>>> >>Regards
>> > 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]