on 11/14/01 12:07 AM, Mark Tucker wrote: > I'd say ANY scan that YOU made, > even from an inferior-hardware scanner , would be better than a > scan from some high-end thing, made by someone who wasn't > there when you shot the image. There is one other option particularly for Grayscale images. You could get a raw scan off a hi-end scanner and "develop" it yourself in Photoshop. (I say particularly for grayscale because they are far easier to process than color materials, with color neg. being the most difficult with it's orange cast). If I were farming out my scans I'd try to get highbit raw scans. The reason is you can then be doing local edits in highbit, something no scanner allows. Todd
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Better Scans, was Re: Print Exchange
2001-11-14 by Todd Flashner