I have had a lot of scans done for me by service bureaus. I very much like the people at NancyScans and they did good work for me. Sometimes I thought they increased the contrast too much at the scanning stage, but that was probably my own fault for not giving them explicit enough instructions. NancyScans does all the spotting for you, and I don't think I ever saw a dust mark, after about 30 scans at 200 MB each (from 6cm x 9cm originals). I had my last few scans done at West Coast Imaging. I liked these scans better than those from NancyScans, probably because Rich Seiling has a more fine art oriented workflow concept -- he simply tries to retain all the information from the original and allow you the most flexibility to "develop" it how you want later on in Photoshop. WCI also spotted my scans for me, and did a very good job, although now and then, there were one or two dust specks left in the scan. I think that if I had communicated effectively enough with NancyScans, then I'd get as good of a scan from them as I got from WCI. In short, both of these service bureaus, in my experience, offer great service, great scans, and are very responsive to their customers. NancyScans gave me the best customer service I've ever gotten from any service bureau. I haven't done any scans for the last year or so because I've been saving up for my own scanner. I ordered an Imacon Photo Flextight this week. As others have stated, I'd rather be doing my own scans working in 16 bits per channel, on a slightly inferior machine (Imacons still can't match Tangos, although they're probably very clsoe). But I'd be very comfortable working again with NancyScans and/or WCI. NancyScans will save out 16 bits, but at an increased cost. Unless you're very concerned about the detail in your shadow, I personally wouldn't spend the extra money for the 16 bits -- it almost doubles the cost of a drum scan. (I work only from color positives and then custom mix the channels myself to get a black and white rendition, so my experiences may not be directly applicable to those working with black and white negative originals.) > Mark Tucker wrote: > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., SKID Photography > > <skid@b...> wrote: > > > Try it yourself. Go to Nancy Scans or some other good, high > > end service bureau, you might be amazed. > > > > I have tried letting outside labs do scans for me, but even though > > they mean well, and they're fine citizens and all that, it's just not > > their image. Nor do they have any sixth-sense feeling about what > > the scan should feel like. So, for me, I don't think I could EVER let > > someone else do a scan for me. >
Message
[Digital BW] Better Scans, was Re: Print Exchange
2001-11-14 by hslavitt@cpdb.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.