--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, BKPhoto@a... wrote: > Roy- > > I pulled test prints through IJC/OPM and QRT. Same grayscale file (12x15 inch > image area). One print at 16-bit, the other at 8-bit. Tests were made with a > 4000 using UC, on Epson Enhanced Matt roll paper. > > There are obvious differences between the RIP's, of course. The supplied > IJC/OPM profile did a better job of matching the on-screen image contrast and > density (I use Dot Gain 20% as my default working gray space). By adjusting the > QRT image using Ink Limit and Gamma, I was able to marginalize the differences. > The colorcasts provided by the two RIP's are also different enough to > influence my judgment. > > I cannot see any significant differences in the prints that I can > subjectively attribute to bit depth. There are differences, but very subtle. With IJC/OPM > the 16-bit file printed with a very small increase in contrast. You can see > this under a loupe. At normal viewing distance, the impression is that the > print is a bit sharper and slightly darker, which is to be expected. These are > small differences, but the kind that I learned to appreciate through many years > of printing in the wet darkroom. > > With QTR I see the opposite. The 8-bit file prints with slightly less density > and a bit more contrast. In my opinion, the 8-bit file is a better print, for > the same basic (and subjective) reasons I like the IJC/OPM 16-bit print. I > used the "cool Selenium" profile, by the way. > > I'm very interested to know what you make of this. My initial thinking is > that each RIP is doing its best work the way it was designed: IJC/OPM with 16-bit > and QTR with 8-bit. > > > > Bill Kennedy > Associate Professor of Photocommunications > St. Edward's University > 512/448-8680 > Thanks, Bill. Well it's interesting that you do see some differences. I'd be hard pressed to speculate why -- especially seeing differences with a loupe. All the dithering (do you get a choice with IJC?) is the same and all 16-bit for both products. Although we both started with gimp-print the 4000 support was done independently. For QTR the difference might be that Photoshop has a more sophisticated algorithm for converting to 8 bit. That might be worth doing. Roy
Message
Re: 16 bit and printer output/info for Roy
2005-01-15 by Roy Harrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.