Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: 16 bit and printer output/info for Roy

2005-01-15 by Roy Harrington

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, BKPhoto@a... wrote:
> Roy-
> 
> I pulled test prints through IJC/OPM and QRT. Same grayscale file (12x15 inch 
> image area). One print at 16-bit, the other at 8-bit. Tests were made with a 
> 4000 using UC, on Epson Enhanced Matt roll paper.
> 
> There are obvious differences between the RIP's, of course. The supplied 
> IJC/OPM profile did a better job of matching the on-screen image contrast and 
> density (I use Dot Gain 20% as my default working gray space). By adjusting the 
> QRT image using Ink Limit and Gamma, I was able to marginalize the differences. 
> The colorcasts provided by the two RIP's are also different enough to 
> influence my judgment.
> 
> I cannot see any significant differences in the prints that I can 
> subjectively attribute to bit depth. There are differences, but very subtle. With IJC/OPM 
> the 16-bit file printed with a very small increase in contrast. You can see 
> this under a loupe. At normal viewing distance, the impression is that the 
> print is a bit sharper and slightly darker, which is to be expected. These are 
> small differences, but the kind that I learned to appreciate through many years 
> of printing in the wet darkroom.
> 
> With QTR I see the opposite. The 8-bit file prints with slightly less density 
> and a bit more contrast. In my opinion, the 8-bit file is a better print, for 
> the same basic (and subjective) reasons I like the IJC/OPM 16-bit print. I 
> used the "cool Selenium" profile, by the way.
> 
> I'm very interested to know what you make of this. My initial thinking is 
> that each RIP is doing its best work the way it was designed: IJC/OPM with 16-bit 
> and QTR with 8-bit.
> 
> 
> 
> Bill Kennedy
> Associate Professor of Photocommunications
> St. Edward's University
> 512/448-8680
> 

Thanks, Bill.

Well it's interesting that you do see some differences.  I'd be hard pressed
to speculate why -- especially seeing differences with a loupe.  All the 
dithering (do you get a choice with IJC?) is the same and all 16-bit for both
products.   Although we both started with gimp-print the 4000 support was
done independently.

For QTR the difference might be that Photoshop has a more sophisticated
algorithm for converting to 8 bit.  That might be worth doing.

Roy

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.