Roy Harrington wrote: >>Is what you propose not already done in most RIPs (but in >>colour mode) ? The linearisation of the channels separate of >>the profiling, the last to the Lab space/axis. In that way you >>could use the LittleCMS or Argyll engine for profiling. The >>fastest way now would be to use either Photoshop or Qimage and >>a B&W adapted ICC profile. Qimage makes RGB print to file >>output, as long as the greyscale isn't corrupted but only the >>steps shifted along the curve it would be right. Doesn't >>provide the right preview on color (tones) but the rest in an >>acceptable way. The linearisation takes care of the paper + >>printer + ink differences. The Lab curve goes on top of that >>and you could probably limit them to the two choices you >>mention, one covering up to 1.7 Dmax, the other to something >>like 2.1. > Yes, that's basically the idea. The grayscale makes things somewhat > simpler though -- I can do the icc profiles myself. > On the Mac its just like printing with a color icc profile. > I'm not as sure what the best Windows workflow would be. > > With Qimage can you apply the profile as you save the "Print to > File"? I think with Photoshop you'd have to Convert to Profile > and save the tiff file. > > The other approach would be to do the perceptual rendering in > QTR using a simple curve. > > Roy The best Windows workflow would be a softproof display on Stephen's GUI which would show the color tone difference of the warm-cold tone slider and the steps shift that is applied with another slider for 1.6 <> 2.2 Dmax Lab curve addition. I guess one could do this with a small (gamut) colour engine to simulate all quad and CM(Y)K greyscale printers :-) The Lab curve addition should have an on-off switch to allow the workflow below. If the above is too complex right now then Qimage's print to file + the softproof preview will show the effect of an ICC profile that uses only the Lab curve. With CM on, Qimage does that right now with any RGB printer profile on Greyscale and RGB files. On any file in the map you print from you can use softproof even before it is loaded in the print queue. 3 profiles would be sufficient I guess. But it will not be correct to use the printer profile also for the (simulated) preview of the warm-cold tone setting as it will influence the RGB file that is exported to QTR. How much that influence will be if the file is converted to greyscale again has to be seen. Of course the monitor profile could be manipulated for that but that's against all rules and an extra step + several monitor profiles are needed then. This also is a good argument to add an RGB>Greyscale converter on Qimage's output or a filter like that on QTR-GUI's input instead of an additional greyscale engine in Qimage. Someone should mention that to Mike, it is low on the list of to do. With profile editors a "null" profile can be made easily by using the scanner target and the same image again as the result. With ICC profile editors one can map the colour in all renderings to the greyscale axis by setting the saturation sliders at total negative. With profile editors that work in PS one can add PS curve information to the profile. A long route so it is probably better to make an "artificial" profile. Don't ask me how. Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: LAB Grayscale Update??
2005-01-17 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.