David, >> ...(You don't want a position that is not used.)... > Did you say this because having an unused position >will lead to ink settling/clogging? I think there is a risk of this. There have been a couple of comments here that the Y position of the UT2-1280 printer is clogged. Note that if you print with the sliders, that position is used. >Makes me worry about the sepia position (unused in >practice) in my 2200/UT setup. Maybe it's not >an issue with the 2200...? I think it is less of a risk with the 2200. From what I can tell one of the main differences between printers designed for pigments as opposed by dyes is that the pigment printers do more routine cleaning cycles. This might be enough. Still, if you don't use sepia, I've been recommending people put a second warm (carbon) light gray there -- the UT7 LC (or UT2 LM). The main noticeable change is that the prints with the sliders will be a bit more neutral. They will also be more lightfast. The less color pigments in the mix the better. Now I'd be looking at Glop in the Y spot if you do glossy printing. I have not tested the 2200 with this ink arrangement, but it seems capable of eliminating about 90% of the bronzing in the 1280 with appropriate curves. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Glop, 1280, Epson driver, and QTR ;)
2005-01-17 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.