Any thoughts on MIS putting this in production? I am running MIS PK (ESC7600-4-PK) with QTR and (a) FSN C, FSN M and FSN Y for neutral prints and (b) UT 2 M and UT 2 LM for warm prints, glop in the LK slot and all prints on EPSG. I can't get next day dMax to exceed 1.90 for either curve. Here are the readings from my neutral curve after a short blast with the hair dryer: Step L a b 05 90.8 -0.3 -2.9 10 86.3 -0.1 -2.3 15 82.0 0.1 1.5 20 77.6 0.3 1.0 25 73.4 0.5 0.8 30 69.5 0.7 0.7 35 65.3 1.0 0.9 40 61.3 1.2 1.1 45 55.8 1.4 1.4 50 52.8 1.8 1.6 55 48.4 2.1 1.7 60 44.1 2.3 1.9 65 39.9 2.5 2.2 70 35.5 2.6 2.4 75 31.4 2.7 2.6 80 27.1 2.8 2.7 85 23.2 2.8 2.7 90 18.0 2.4 1.9 95 14.5 2.3 1.3 100 09.8 0.3 0.6 With BO I get a 100 step reading of L=10.1, a=0.2, b=-0.5. The curves limit inks to 90% and overlap the PK with the "dark grey" by 10%. I am going to cross check with an Epson PK cartridge. Steve > From: Paul Roark <paul.roark@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:46:04 -0800 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Neutral Photo Black > > > The initial dmax of Ilford with the PKN3 jumped to over 2.5. The others > jumped also. The shadows are now cool. The midtones are cool, with C > typically .03 density units above Y. This makes a great BO ink. > > PKN3 is still mostly carbon, just with blue (and none of that weakling > magenta) added. > > We can now match the cool shadows of the selenium-toned silver prints. Add > Glop to take care of the bronzing, and I see a new inkset. MIS is going to > hate me. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > ___________________ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Roark [mailto:paul.roark@...] > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 9:18 AM > To: DigitalB&WPrint > Subject: [Digital BW] Neutral Photo Black > > > These are some of the "next day" readings of the current (version 2) of the > neutral "PKN2." All of these were printed with a 1280. In addition to the > dmax, I note the BO 50% CMY and Lab (a, b) readings (after application of a > curve to linearize the output). The BO prints tend to be slightly cool in > the highlights, neutral at 50%, and reach their warmest point at about 75% > to 85%. The Lab a (red-green axis) stays relatively the same. The Lab b > (yellow-blue) is what varies. So, I note the "warmest" (highest) Lab b > value in the shadows, since getting rid of the warm crossovers in the > shadows is one of my goals. > > > > Kirkland MIS PK = 2.14, PKN2 = 2.29, BO 50% CMY all = .61, Lab (a, b) = > (.17, -.49), warmest b = .99; > > > > Premium Semigloss MIS PK = 2.06, PKN2 = 2.18, BO 50% CMY all = .61, (-.02, > .54), warmest b = 1.08; > > > > Ilford Smooth Pearl (I have no good MIS PK comparison), > > PKN2 100% = 2.31, 50% = .60 all, Lab (a, b) = (.39, > -.31), warmest b = 1.24; > > > > PSM MIS PK = 1.96, PKN2 = 2.03, BO 50% CMY = .60, .59, .59, (.15, -.61), > warmest b = -.2 > > > > > > There will be another PKNx today that will be cooler. I'm curious to see if > the dmax can go higher, how cool the inkset needs to be to get totally rid > of the warmth in the deep shadows, and whether a cooler version makes for > better BO prints on popular glossy papers. I tend to think glossy prints > look better if they are a bit on the cool side. Also, if the PKN were > cooler, people could always buy bulk and mix it with MIS PK to achieve the > degree of coolness or warmth they prefer.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Neutral Photo Black
2005-01-21 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.