Digital BW, The Print

On 1/23/05 8:05 AM, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote:

Paul,

I have found the 2200 UT-7 to be a great ink set.  I have been working on
profiles for IJC/OPM ( Mac and PC) and will have these available soon.  On
glossy papers, like the Kirkland Gloss I¹m getting a 2.4 D-Max.

I do think that the MIS information is in reference to the 2200 UT profiles
not being compatible with the UT-7 inks.  This is true, the 2200 UT inks are
very different then the UT-7 inks.

Joe

> Lou,
> 
> IJC/OPM is clearly capable of running the UT7 inkset.  I think the confusion
> might be that about a year ago MIS and Bowhaus came up with a specialized
> inkset for IJC.  The profiles for that inkset would not work with UT7.  But
> IJC is very capable of running any inkset on a 2200 from what I have seen --
> as long as the profiles have been made.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ldina [mailto:lbdina@...]
> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 7:57 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Using UT7 Inkset with IJC/OPM
> 
> 
> 
> Paul,
> 
> I was speaking with Joe Berndt at Bowhaus the other day and he said
> he was developing some profiles with IJC/OPM using the MIS UT7 inkset
> and a 2200.  I told him the MIS site specifically says NOT to use UT7
> with the Bowhaus IJC/OPM program, and that they are designed for use
> with the Epson driver and your curves.  Joe said he was getting great
> results using the UT7 set with IJC/OPM, and saw absoultely no reason
> not to use them, especially since IJC can create profiles for any
> inkset that fits into the printer.
> 
> Just thought I'd ask your opinion, since you developed many of these
> inks and created curves for their use.
> 
> I am using the standard UC inkset at present, but would like to try
> the UT7 set.  My biggest concern is problems I may have when swapping
> inksets in and out of my 2200.  Not sure the best way to go, or
> whether to wait until I buy another larger printer (maybe a 4000 or
> 7600) for color work, dedicating my 2200 to B&W.  I'd buy a C86, but
> I want larger prints, and I don't think the C86 is supported by
> IJC/OPM.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lou
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]