Digital BW, The Print

Paul, Joe, and Lou:

Like Lou, I'm running UT (not UT7) in my 2200 w/IJC. I 
admit to some befuddlement over the three MIS UT 
variants, so I've stuck with the plain old UT's. 
Besides, I already have a set of 4oz UT bottles. 
Now, though, I've almost used them up. 

Should I be considering switching to the UT7 when my ink 
runs out? These DMax numbers got my attention. Does UT7 
yield better results than UT in general, or is the 
difference simply due to UT7 being designed to run 
under the Epson driver, and they're otherwise equivalent? 
Any other factors I'd want to consider? I assume 
I'd need fresh carts.

Thanks,
David Wroblewski



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Joe Berndt
<joeberndt@v...> wrote:
> On 1/23/05 8:05 AM, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> 
> Paul,
> 
> I have found the 2200 UT-7 to be a great ink set.  I have been
working on
> profiles for IJC/OPM ( Mac and PC) and will have these available
soon.  On
> glossy papers, like the Kirkland Gloss I¹m getting a 2.4 D-Max.
> 
> I do think that the MIS information is in reference to the 2200 UT
profiles
> not being compatible with the UT-7 inks.  This is true, the 2200 UT
inks are
> very different then the UT-7 inks.
> 
> Joe
> 
> > Lou,
> > 
> > IJC/OPM is clearly capable of running the UT7 inkset.  I think the
confusion
> > might be that about a year ago MIS and Bowhaus came up with a
specialized
> > inkset for IJC.  The profiles for that inkset would not work with
UT7.  But
> > IJC is very capable of running any inkset on a 2200 from what I
have seen --
> > as long as the profiles have been made.
> > 
> > Paul
> > www.PaulRoark.com
> > 
> >