Paul, I'm printing on EEM with the Matte Paper setting (also tried Photo Paper), both 1440 and 2880 dpi, with the neutral curve. Also, I'm using the Eboni black ink-- haven't tried photo black yet. I'm going to make some scans tonight and post them on the web so you can see exactly what I'm talking about-- I think a picture in this case will really be worth a thousand words. Thank you for your offer for the test strip. I'll send you my address. -Steve --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > Steve, > > >... 1280 printer and a set of UT2 inks. ... > > >In the prints I've made with the UT2 inks, I've noticed, under a loupe > >and with the naked eye, obvious dot patterns in the highlights, > > Under a loupe one might be able to see some dots on some papers under some > lighting conditions. Looking at a test strip of PremierArt 205 under a > loupe, I see the paper texture and not dots, at least in reflected, overhead > light that is at a fair angle. With another magnifier and more straight-on > light I might be able to distinguish the dots from the paper texture, but > it's not clear to me. With back lighting I see some roughness, but it could > be the paper and not dots. > > Other papers might show more dots. > > >...it appears that UT2 does not have a light gray (toned or untoned) ink > > The system uses a black ink, 2 dark gray inks (cool and warm carbon), and 3 > lighter gray inks (cool, warm [carbon], and sepia). Then there are 3 > different dot sizes for each of these due to the variable-dot technology. > > The system is much like the OEM inks in the density distribution. However, > the UT2 inks are very low gamut, thus giving them far less color contrast > than the color inks. > > I'm sure you've checked the resolution and other settings. > > What paper, black ink, and media type setting are you using? > > There are, of course, trade-offs between number and lightness of the inks, > and other factors. The lighter inks in my previous efforts, for example, > tended to flood glossy papers. The light inks often cause the worst > bronzing. BO printing with the new neutral photo black mix, for example, > has less objectionable bronzing than the UT2 inkset. In the R800 there are > no more light inks. > > But, back to your issue, I can't tell what you're looking at. Send me your > address off list and I'll mail one of the PA 205 UT2 Medium Warm test strips > I printed today. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] UT2 inks and dots in highlights
2005-01-28 by Stephen P. Veillette
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.