Jeff- Excellent questions. I, for one, do not think that Piezo is dead. I've been using the various Piezo approach since the beginning and am well aware of the problems. Personally, I think Cone's inks are excellent and his new ICC approach is a valuable step forward for printing grayscale off the OEM path. I think, and hope, that we'll see more developments like this. I'm not, in any way, defending Cone but it has been my experience that many of the printing issues attributed to Piezo have more to do with the printers. Many photographers are using consumer grade printers that have inherent issues out of the box; some of the these issues, like banding for example, aren't obvious when using the Epson dither and printer gamma bias, but are noticeable when the tonal scale is linearized and resolution is improved. I, for one, deeply appreciate Cone's continuing innovation. As I do Roy Harrington and Paul Roark, among others. I've printing with a number of Epsons and consider the 4000 one of the best yet. I wish the paper feed issues were better addressed, but the printer is convenient to use and produces excellent prints; both with the OEM print driver and all the current desktop RIP's. ImagePrint is not superior to QRT because they are essentially different animals. QTR is built on open source code and available as freeware. If you use the supplied printing curves the approach is very close to plug and play. ImagePrint is a feature-rich commercial application. If you want or need the features, and you do not want to purchase the software/hardware or tackle the learning curve associated with building linearized custom printing profiles yourself, it is also a convenient package. If you do want to "roll your own" the ColorBurst RIP is an excellent choice. QTR using printing curves. ImagePrint and ColorBurst use printer profiles. All of them, used properly, produce excellent prints. For the price, QTR is an excellent entry point. If you have any questions, I'd be happy to correspond with you on or off list. Bill Kennedy Associate Professor of Photocommunications St. Edward's University 512/448-8680 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Piezography? Or, the state of the state.
2005-01-28 by BKPhoto@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.