For anyone who is interested, I've posted some sample images that illustrate what I have tried to describe: http://www.savagesteve.net/ut2 The stepwedge images show the dot patterns the best. Again, I'm interested to know if this is just me (hardware problem, curve/driver problem, brain matter problem) or if this is normal. -Steve --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen P. Veillette" <stephen@v...> wrote: > > Paul, > > I'm printing on EEM with the Matte Paper setting (also tried Photo > Paper), both 1440 and 2880 dpi, with the neutral curve. Also, I'm > using the Eboni black ink-- haven't tried photo black yet. > > I'm going to make some scans tonight and post them on the web so you > can see exactly what I'm talking about-- I think a picture in this > case will really be worth a thousand words. > > Thank you for your offer for the test strip. I'll send you my address. > > -Steve > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" > <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > > Steve, > > > > >... 1280 printer and a set of UT2 inks. ... > > > > >In the prints I've made with the UT2 inks, I've noticed, under a loupe > > >and with the naked eye, obvious dot patterns in the highlights, > > > > Under a loupe one might be able to see some dots on some papers > under some > > lighting conditions. Looking at a test strip of PremierArt 205 under a > > loupe, I see the paper texture and not dots, at least in reflected, > overhead > > light that is at a fair angle. With another magnifier and more > straight-on > > light I might be able to distinguish the dots from the paper > texture, but > > it's not clear to me. With back lighting I see some roughness, but > it could > > be the paper and not dots. > > > > Other papers might show more dots. > > > > >...it appears that UT2 does not have a light gray (toned or > untoned) ink > > > > The system uses a black ink, 2 dark gray inks (cool and warm > carbon), and 3 > > lighter gray inks (cool, warm [carbon], and sepia). Then there are 3 > > different dot sizes for each of these due to the variable-dot > technology. > > > > The system is much like the OEM inks in the density distribution. > However, > > the UT2 inks are very low gamut, thus giving them far less color > contrast > > than the color inks. > > > > I'm sure you've checked the resolution and other settings. > > > > What paper, black ink, and media type setting are you using? > > > > There are, of course, trade-offs between number and lightness of the > inks, > > and other factors. The lighter inks in my previous efforts, for > example, > > tended to flood glossy papers. The light inks often cause the worst > > bronzing. BO printing with the new neutral photo black mix, for > example, > > has less objectionable bronzing than the UT2 inkset. In the R800 > there are > > no more light inks. > > > > But, back to your issue, I can't tell what you're looking at. Send > me your > > address off list and I'll mail one of the PA 205 UT2 Medium Warm > test strips > > I printed today. > > > > Paul > > www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] UT2 inks and dots in highlights
2005-01-29 by Stephen P. Veillette
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.