This "wisdom" attempts to answer a bit, the questions posed by Jeff Curto. I used MIS and then Piezography for a good 5 years on several printers, the Epson 3000 and the Epson 1160. They were great printers and great B/W work flows 3 - 4 years ago. But then it happened. What? I don't exactly know but my beautiful process went to hell. I think the printers went from slow to slower, Cones inks changed and I never did sucessfully make that work. About a year ago I abandoned both. I was just plain tired of struggling and spending money on old technology, or imperfect products, whatever. I now have a 2200, but the ink tanks are small and I have no need to do much work on it. I may sell if I get a good offer. I also have the 4000 and think it's great. I can almost get great B/W prints using all the inks and Mac Holberts (CD with the 4000) workflow, but, and I struggled with this one, they have a bit of metamerism (not objectionable in most light as a stand alone print). I now have the ImagePrint RIP and the results are great. A lot of money but this RIP has everything in the way of options. There is a big learning curve and I am on the bottom so ask me in 6 months, but for now this is the way to go. My friends have the same setup and I know it works for them. Also if time is a factor You can get a 16x20 very fast instead of 1 1/2 hours on the 3000. I don't know about QTR? I hear it is slow and I don't like the sound of the process. Art Schaefer
Message
Piezography? Or the state of the state.
2005-01-29 by Arthur Schaefer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.