For the record: We got the Peerless because it was really an IBM product, so that it shouldn't suffer the 'click of death' and that it *is* portable. In many of the reviews, it was pointed out that all the other 'portable' hard drives were really just 'external' ones and too fragile to considered portable (like via a messenger). At the time, I had not considered owning a high end scanner, and all the service bureaus were charging extra to burn to a CD, so I figured that the Peerless was the way to go. We could messenger the disks around, either from the service bureaus or to/from clients. And as far as a club name....Weighing in at 240#, I could have easily been Chubbie Boy myself....But, *that* is also a slang, closely related to SK©ID....Think about it. ;- D Harvey Ferdschneider partner, SKID photography, NYC Mark Tucker wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., SKID Photography > <skid@b...> wrote: > Now, we are chomping through those 27 gigs and have recently > bought into a new Iomega > > system called the 'Peerless'. > > > I have always envisioned a box of some kind, that would hold > slide-in harddrives. Maybe the box had five or six slots, and you > could just slide in another 75gig drive as you needed the > storage. > > Someone recently sent me a link to a device that was similar to > this, but I've lost the URL now. So I know that it at least exists in > some form. > > The burning-CD business got old really fast, especially when > Toast won't run in the background. And 640megs is just not > enough space to devote that much time to hogging your Mac. > The ideal solution would be to do these monster backups at > night, when you were leaving work, and then let it run as long as > it needed to. I have now, in my G4, the 30gig that shipped with it, > and then a second 75gig drive. They are now so cheap (IDE) that > that Zip thingie seems overpriced to me, for the amount of > storage that you get. > > And this doesn't even address the issue of reduncancy. Now that > you've got everything on a couple of drives, now you'd want all > that backed up. And for me, I'd also want something where I > could easily keep the backup data in a totally separate location, > in case of fire. So you can see it could get complicated pretty > quickly. > > I'd love to hear any solutions that anyone has come up with, > especially if it was in the 200-300gig amounts. > > -Mark Tucker > > PS. Harvey: Regarding the history/origin of your company name, I > got quite a kick out of it. Thanks for the great story. I did end up > feeling a bit "Baptist" as I compared my company name to yours. > I also began to wonder what MY name would have been, if I had > been in one of those clubs; maybe "Oreo DoubleStuff Cookie > Boy", or "BarBQ Boy", or "Chubbie Boy". > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Better Storage, was Better Scans
2001-11-15 by SKID Photography
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.