On Jan 31, 2005, at 11:31 PM, David Keenan wrote: > > Stretch your budget a bit and get the Minolta 5400. (This assumes you > are looking for 35mm only.) 5400 is great, i agree... for 35 mm... > I've read how people extoll the virtues of Vuescan and Silverfast -- > I've given each a try but I cannot find how they are superior to the > (free) software that comes with the 5400 scanner. Both are > counter-inituitive (especially Silverfast) and don't appear to handle > multiple (batch) scanning which even at six frames at a time for negs > and five frames at a time for slides can be quite useful at times. i'm a vuescan fan -- so let me contradict you :-) --- vuescan does handle batches --- very easily, i'm doing one right now - specifying which frames i want to get scanned... i sometimes compare scans using vuescan and dimage -- when i think that the scan is just not coming out OK - to check if something got changed in the vuescan inadvertently... silverfast --- i don't bother with... it is too cumbersome... > I don't need my scanner software to do tons of image mantipulation and > editing -- I have an overly complicated piece of software called > PhotoShop CS i don't use vuescan to manipulate --- it just gives a nice low contrast scan that i can "manipulate" in PS --- altaf
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 35mm film scanner
2005-02-01 by Altaf Bhimji
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.