Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

[Digital BW] Re: Any advantage to resizing in RAW?

2005-02-02 by ldina

Steve,

Nice!  I love my 20D, but it doesn't have the rez of your new toy.  

Some of Canon's digital cameras (I think a rather small sampling) 
have had some problems with front or back focusing.  My first 300D 
had a definite back focusing problem.  I finally proved it to the 
store who sold it to me, and they gave me another camera, which was 
right on the money.  Before I bought my 20D, I tested it for focusing 
accuracy before I bought it.  It is also fine.

I mention this because the impression with my first camera was one of 
unsharp images in general.  It probably just wasn't properly 
calibrated in the factory. I'd focus on the eyes of my subject, and 
they would be out of focus.  Very irritating.

I have blown up images to 16X20 from my 300D and 20D that are very 
sharp and clean.  Incredible quality.  My old 35mm images would 
appear soft and mushy in comparison when blown up that large.  I 
would think your 1Ds MK II would be pretty close to your medium 
format if all is properly calibrated.  

Good luck with your camera.

Lou

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale 
<stevekale@b...> wrote:
> Hi Lou and John
> 
> I am using a Canon 1Ds MK II.  Still getting used to it and working 
in RAW.
> 
> [I must admit I find going back to my Canon lenses (28-70 F2.8L and 
70-200
> F2.8L) from my Contax medium format lenses quite a drop in 
sharpness but
> maybe I have still just got a way to go before I am used to using 
the new
> camera.]
> 
> Thanks for the help
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> > From: ldina <lbdina@c...>
> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 02:44:35 -0000
> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Any advantage to resizing in RAW?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > That's right.  I forgot about cameras with unconventional pixel
> > shapes.  
> > 
> > This has been discussed quite a bit on the Adobe Camera Raw forum,
> > including contributions by Thomas Knoll (author or PS and ACR), 
and
> > Bruce Fraser, author of Real World Camera Raw.  I agree, with most
> > cameras, there is no difference.  I shoot with a Canon 20D and 
see no
> > difference between using ACR or PS.  I prefer to do it in PS, 
where I
> > have more choices and more control.
> > 
> > Lou
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John 
Vitollo"
> > <jvlist@c...> wrote:
> >> 
> >> "Steve Kale" wrote:
> >>> Is there any advantage to
> >>> resizing an image in RAW (eg using Capture One Pro) rather than
> > in PS?
> >> 
> >> ACR's resizing is better with a camera that has non-square 
pixels -
> > such as the Fuji S2.
> >> 
> >> If using a Canon camera there is no advantage using ACR or
> > Photoshop.
> >> 
> >> What camera are you using?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other 
resources as
> > they are often being updated.
> > 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > 
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you 
wish to
> > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
this same
> > page.
> > 
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier 
messages to keep
> > them short.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
flames.
> > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from 
the membership
> > without notice.
> > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of 
digital B&W
> > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be 
removed from the
> > membership.
> > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules 
and
> > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the 
group Owner and
> > Moderators. See ³Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines² in the Files 
section:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> > 
> > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, 
THE PRINT
> > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE ³OWNER² 
AND
> > ³MODERATORS² OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE 
LIABLE TO YOU
> > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR 
EXEMPLARY
> > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF 
PROFITS, GOODWILL,
> > USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  ³OWNER² AND 
³MODERATORS² OF
> > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE 
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
> > DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE 
DIGITAL BW,
> > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION 
OF YOUR
> > TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD 
PARTY ON THE
> > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER 
RELATING TO THE
> > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> >  
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> >

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.