--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, claudej1@a... wrote: > I also think that the best inkjet black and white prints still do not come > close to the depth and richness of a tray processed fiber-based print from > well-exposed black and white film. There is still a big difference. > -scott > > That is an opinion requiring further observation and experience, not fact. Based on my own 45 years of printing and looking at prints, I'd say that my ink jet prints are plenty close enough now. But that's only because I'm only a good digital printer, and I was pretty darn good in the wet lab. 35 years vs. 10. There's a lot in common. But. Based on prints I've seen, made by Tyler Boley in Seattle and others, it is flat FALSE. The proviso stated is "close to the depth and richness of a tray processed fiber-based print". If you ask ink jet prints to precisely emulate the look of another traditional medium, there has never been a close contender. Inkjet can do a pretty convincing faux-carbo. Platinum. Dye transfer. Agfa Brovira! That whole wing of the discussion is like faulting platinum prints for not capturing that subtle surface reflection you can ONLY REALLY get with air dried, selenium toned, gelatin silver prints. But, in terms of "depth and richness", my opinion is there's NEVER been a comparable medium in the whole history. If you compared the best contemporary ink jet with ANY collection of classic wet prints: 1. at normal bare eye viewing distance (under glass?? or not) you would usually be in the realm of lucky guess if you could distinguish the digital ones; or 2. wonder why anyone thought there was a worthy question; or 3. notice that some of them didn't look like real air dried gelatine yada...; or 4. pick out all the digital ones because they looked better to you. imHo, if we all put as much energy into realizing our vision and making the best pictures we could as we do into this class of concern, at the very least, we might have more good DIGITAL BLACK AND WHITE PRINTS!!! (OnT) (G) Jim
Message
Re: Only an opinion
2005-02-05 by lenzzman44
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.