Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Only an opinion

2005-02-05 by Brian Mikiten

> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, claudej1@a...
> wrote:
>> I also  think that the best inkjet black and white prints still do
> not come
>> close  to the depth and richness of a tray processed fiber-based
> print from
>> well-exposed black and white film. There is still a big difference.
>
>> -scott
>>
>> That is an opinion requiring further observation and experience,
> not fact.
>
>
I've been a really harsh critic of digital printing for years but I 
have to disagree based on some recent prints I saw from Paul Roark. I 
believe that we finally have a medium that can produce a truly fine 
print (especially under glass in a typical viewing environment) and can 
be accepted as a fine art print.  Yes, you need a drum scan and some 
significant photoshop skills as well as expensive inks and paper but 
that is nothing compared to what I spent on my 8x10 and 4x5 capable 
darkrooms in the past. <G>

Brian



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.