Digital BW, The Print

Bill,
  
You wrote, off list:

>Can anyone tell me where to get the Eboni curves referred to in 
>Paul's message? Thanks.

(My attempt to respond off list was rejected by your yahoo mail box.)

MIS has curves, but I never know how updated they are.

My website also has curves.  The general index of printing information is at
http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/index.htm ; the curves are at separate pages,
depending on the printer.  Note the procedure needed to download the curves.
My ISP is not set up for this, so it changes the extension to ".htm."  You
have to manually save them as "*.acv" files.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

__________________ 




--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> > Could someone please clue me in on what PKN and LKN are. 
> >What is the difference between PK and PKN, etc.
> 
> LKN has been used in the UT7 inkset for some time.  It's just a neutral
> version of the otherwise rather warm MIS LK.  I found that if the
ink was
> not neutralized the shadows of prints made with the sliders became
overly
> warm.  When curves are used, there is very little effect or difference.
> 
> PKN is a new neutralized MIS PK.  Again, the usual Pk -- MIS or
Epson -- is
> very warm.  So, the PKN allows those who want to do black only
printing the
> option of a neutral print on glossy paper.
> 
> Also of interest, the PKN has a better dmax than the standard MIS PK.
> 
> In the UT2 inkset (and perhaps also UT7, but I have not tested that) the
> glossy "Eboni" curves that generate the black from the 2 dark gray
inks are
> still the better way to print on at least Epson Semigloss.  The dmax is
> about the same as PKN, and the use of the 2 dark grays minimizes the
gloss
> differential.
> 
> I have not yet fade tested the PKN.  I would expect that the pure
carbon PK
> would do slightly better due to there being some color pigments in
the PKN,
> and the darker dmax will cause the PKN to heat up more, accelerating any
> fading.  (The latter factor would not differ significantly in normal
> display.  As such, the fade test will probably exaggerate the
differences.)
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com