> It's close, but the 1280 is a bit smoother in the highlights. The 2000P is > an excellent matte printer with the monotone MIS FS or FSN inksets, but I > don't think it's equal to the newer ones for glossy prints. > > If all you want to do is 8x10, the C86 with the MIS EZ inkset is hard to > beat and easy on the wallet. While it doesn't have a "glop" option, at the > 8x10 size, the Costco paper is so good and cheap, it is hard to beat that > combination also. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com I generally prefer satin and matte papers, especially for B&W, so glossy-printing ability is not really a concern. Wide-format capability is tempting but I'm somewhat put off by the notorious clogging issues with the 1280. Using pigment inks in a dye-based inkjet seems inherently like a recipe for trouble, though experiences seem to vary. I'll have to check out the 2000p some more despite my reservations about the larger droplet size. Thanks Paul. ~ J
Message
Re: [Digital BW] c86/1280/2000p Letter-size and smaller comparison
2005-02-09 by jtherevelator
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.