You are correct. But even if it does it in 3 mins., I'd be happy. Scott --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, claudej1@a... wrote: > 1:51 for an 11x14? I can get that on an 8x10 on an R800..........BUT, it's > not at the highest quality setting. > > Kinda reminds me of Hi-Fi ads in the Seventies for cheap stereos "200 watts > IPP" (15 wrms), > > The first number was gross exaggeration by an optimistic measurement > technique, the second, in really small type in parentheses was the truth. > > Reminds me of Kodak's 75 second claim on their dye sub printers. They never > mention file rasterization time, which is real world, not putting a stopwatch > on pre-rasterized multi-copies, which is laboratory fantasy. > > I'm assuming most people want the best quality possible with those printers, > so the real time is much longer. Just don't base your production on those > figures and you will be fine. > > Claude > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: "Screaming" 1800 Epson
2005-02-16 by scott_now_coming
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.