Tom Baker wrote: > Paul wrote: "...It surprises me that even under UV glass the spray would add that much." > > At least the high end uv glasses claim 99+% uv blockage. So, how could the expected life of the print be doubled by spraying? Something doesn't seem to add up here. > > Tom Baker Visible light contributes much more to fading in this test than UV. So UV is just one of the fading dangers. There's also gas fading, humidity etc that can be blocked by a thicker layer of (UV) varnish. The ozone test result may give the explanation. That a (thicker) varnish will influence the print's appearence before the test starts is without doubt. So will another paper color. Wilhelm only measures the differences between a good print and the print in test till the last gets an unacceptable shift to the original. Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Wilhelm updated 9600 data
2005-02-17 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.