Yeah, with QTR I often think in terms of creating two curves that I intend to combine at print time with the blending function to get exactly the tone I want. It makes curve creation less complex and allows me to focus on getting a good grayscale in each curve first and then find a good tone afterwards. There's nothing to stop you from creating a single curve with exactly the tone you want though. You could create a curve with K, M, and LM for the gray part of the curve and C and LC (or just C) for the toner part of the curve. Then you could adjust the strength of the toner by adjusting the ink limit for the toner ink, or by loading a custom photoshop curve for the toner part of the curve, or by adjusting its shadow/highlight/gamma parameters. -- Daniel Staver http://daniel.staver.no Tom Husband wrote: >>The UT2 inkset uses M and LM for the untoned carbon gray inks and C and >>LC for the cool toner inks. A curve for matte paper would typically use >>K, M and LM for the carbon curve and K, C and LC for the cool toner >>curve. Then you would blend these two to get your desired tone. Of >>course there are many other ways to do it as well, but this could be a >>good starting point. > > > So I should create two curves. Warm with K, M and LM and cool with K, > C and LC to be able to combine them?
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Figuring Ink Density Calibration for QTR Curves
2005-02-19 by Daniel Staver
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.