Tom, Photoshop rounds all L* values to integers and I don't know of any easy, painless way around that. Since matte papers have L* values that usually go from the mid teens for shadows to 96-98 for highlights, and glossy papers go from single digits in shadows to 96- 98 in the highlights, you should be okay using integers. Dividing the overall dynamic range by 21 still gives you about 4 L* units difference from step to step depending on the paper you are profiling. You will still get a pretty darn good linearization. Spectros and densitometers can give you finer precision, but you may not see all that much of a difference as long as your scanner is reading raw data that hasn't been adjusted or converted during scanning. (Auto features should be disabled when scanning). Give it a try and see how it comes out. Lou --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Husband" <thusband@s...> wrote: > > I'm at the point of entering densities from the 21 step wedge and am > using a scanner and PS CS to measure. I've set the second info > palette to LAB but when moving over the each density it only shows > whole numbers and no decimal point in "L". All the other QTR curves > are out to three decimal places. Is there a way to get PS CS to read > that way? I must be missing something. > > Thanks, > > Tom
Message
Re: Linearizing a QTR Curve
2005-02-21 by Louis Dina
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.