I have to jump in and agree on the pencil thing, unless the Rapidograph w/ K ink works out. Sharpies are deadly!! Archivally, they bring the whole piece down IMHO. On the pencil vs. black ink thing: I think pencil is less intrusive to the work. The dark ink would draw the eye, where the pencil would just "be there." Seth ==-----Original Message----- ==From: John C. Lewis [mailto:lewiseye@...] == ==Arlene is also correct in advising that prints be signed in pencil. ==And it is preferred by curators. No, not so it can be erased, rather ==because graphite is safe, and when used properly on the back ==side of the print, will not show or leach through. ==
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re:signing
2005-02-24 by Seth
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.