To be precise I think the rotring pen is branded "isograph" - these are the refillable ones that come empty to begin with. One issue with them: they have a fine (depending on pen) steel nib which catches easily on RC paper if moved at speed (eg while signing). And to Seth: why on earth do you not consider "glossy" an exhibition medium? We are talking about RC papers generally here and so I will assume you extend your view to semi-matte RC paper. I have to say that almost all conventional and Lightjet work I have seen exhibited would fall into the glossy or semi-matte category. RC ink jet is not as prevalent simply because of the issues we have been trying to overcome (bronzing-free longevity). I suspect you have the cart before the horse on this one. > From: Steven Karafyllakis <steve@...> > >> > The rapidograph works well because it is A)the same ink you just > made your print with (Shirley no curator can object to that) > and B) You can dilute the ink to give you any shade you want. > I also dislike a dark, obtrusive signature; I have it diluted to > about the same shade as a no3 pencil. IT DOES NOT work well on matte > papers, even RC, though it does work on air-dried fiber-base glossy > paper. As long as you keep it to semi-gloss and glossy papers, its > fine. They real down side though is: you only get one shot at it, so > practice first on scrap! > > Steve Karafyllakis > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re:signing
2005-02-24 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.