Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: 1280 vs. 2000P Question

2001-11-19 by TerryR

Helene,

Yes, that is correct. Paul and I worked on the curves a while back. 
Paul has them, or I can send them.

Terry

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., grdglass@a... wrote:
> Terry,
> 
> Just to clarify...are you saying that you have used the MIS VM inks 
with the 
> 2000P?
> If so, how did you do it and with which curves?
> 
> Helene 
> 
> 
> > When you consider the 2000P has 7 picoliter heads and the 1280 
has 4, 
> > it is amazing just how smooth the 2000P is in comparing prints. 
Yes 
> > you can look at them under a loupe and the 1280 will look better 
> > (esp. at 2880), but at a standard viewing distance the 2000P 
looks 
> > more like a "traditional" photo to me. This printer did 
exceptionally 
> > well with the VM inks, no printer induced "artifacting" that I 
could 
> > detect - banding, etc...
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.