I'm curious now. I've always signed my inkjet prints the same way as the silver or platinum prints, i.e., under the image area on the print with the date, in pencil (I don't print with RC papers since I don't like them just like I didn't like them in the darkroom), and then matted with a window matte with a little more space in the signature area. I look at a lot of prints and have been in a lot of galleries and museums, and have bought a fair number of prints - I've seen prints signed as above and en verso, but: I've never seen a print signed on a mat. What well-known photographers do this? Just asking. --Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: ArleneLoveL@... [mailto:ArleneLoveL@...] > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 4:58 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: [Digest Number 2886 > > > To John Lewis: Thanks for backing me up. Just because a > "great" photographer signed a matte doesn't mean we have to > follow her poor judgement in presentation.. Curators and > gallerists are strange breeds - they do get bent out of shape > when the less-than-famous present work in an uneducated manner.
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: [Digest Number 2886
2005-02-25 by Ken Carney
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.