Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] scanning 5"x7" with epson 4870

2005-02-26 by lulalake_1999

Close but no cigar.

The subject has been explored pretty thoroughly on the Yahoo 4870 
group.

The problem is that the focal plane for a transparency scan is a bit 
higher off the platen than for a reflective scan and the DOF isn't 
quite deep enough to give a sharp image.

Use the 4x5 tranny holder that comes with the 4870, or the 
alternative which is to cut a matt board with the correct thickness, 
approx .070, then put the tranny over that, then put a piece of ANR 
(anti Newton Ring) glass over it to flatten the tranny. One can even 
wet mount it doing this.I've wet mounted 35mm with very good results, 
however I mostly do MF with Doug Fisher's aftermarket MF film holder. 
(It blows the doors off of the epson "cracker Jack toy" film holder)

Jules


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Peter Gorwin 
<pshelleyg@c...> wrote:
> I have scanned 4X5 negs on my 3200 in lieu of the adapter that came 
> with the flatbed:  If you have access to a mat cutter, simply cut a 
> black mat, 2-ply, to the dimensions of the top of your flatbed, and 
> then cut a 5X7 window in it.  By simply placing the negative in 
direct 
> contact with the glass on the flatbed and using the board with the 
> window as a mask, you can shield out any undesirable light that 
bleeds 
> through during the scanning process.  You of course must use the 
top 
> light attachment as with the adapters that come with the scanner.  
(If 
> this approach worked with the 3200, it should work with the 4870.)  
> Peter G.
> 
> On Feb 25, 2005, at 2:15 PM, Dan Koons wrote:
> 
> >
> > I e mailed epson asking if their 4870 could scan  5x7 negative. 
they 
> > said yes if you make an adapter. Anyone out there tried this? 
Does 
> > anyone have another idea? I would appreciate any input    Dan
> >

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.