Having worked in museum for more than twenty years, I'll jump in and give a perspective from there... Dry mounting was very prevalent for photographs up through the 60's as it provided stability against curl, physical protection, and even a little extra crispness from the little bit of ferrotypeing that would occur under the heat and pressure. However it began to lose favor in the 70's as photography became more and more a "fine art". Traditionally, other print media would be hinge mounted and art photographers began doing this, in part to emulate fine art. And while it was long suspected that dry mounting was an archival problem in that the fusion material may have deteriorative effects on the print and mount, over time it became evident that more often the problem was the deterioration of the mount board itself. Photographers also began printing with the image well within the paper edge, in part to emulate other print types (and separate them from the 1/4 inch borders of commercial printers) as well as providing a visual "matt" for the image when showing a box of prints without the necessity of mounting everything. The most compelling reason not to use permanent mounting techniques is that, as the mount/matt is meant to protect the print from physical damage, it invariably becomes damaged itself and needs to be replace. Also, as presentation styles change over time, prints can be re-matted to fit the current trend. Having the ability to easily remove and replace the mount/matt is really a necessity over the the life (100+ years?) of a print. Believe me, having had to prepare prints that were dry mounted for exhibition can be a major pain. I would recommend mounting prints with archival tape using the "T" or "hinge" mount technique. Archival tape will not damage the print and can easily be removed by dampening from behind. If you want to "float" mount a full bleed image, you can to it with a hinge mount. It will not lay perfectly flat, but it does give an "artistic" effect. Archival photo corner mounts are also acceptable for small prints but make sure to leave a little extra play in them for expansion. Of course, if you go this way, you'd want to sign the print so that it travels from mount to mount. John
Message
Re: Signing and Matting
2005-02-26 by mojojones2001
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.