Steve Kale wrote: > I know we have chatted about this but I was wondering what demand might be > out there for you for "standard frame sizes" which allow extra room at the > bottom for signature etc. For example, a 10x15 image might require a mat > opening of 11.5 x 15.75 inches (3/8in top and sides and 1 1/8in at the > bottom). > > (By way of comparison, your 10.75 x 16.75 opening works for a 10x15 portrait > image where the artist wants extra room at the bottom: borders are 3/8 left, > 3/8 right, 3/8 top and 1 1/8 bottom.) Just FYI, Steve, when I'm signing on the print (below the image) I only allow an extra 1/4" or so, and I sign/title/etc. quite small. Given a 3/8" margin on the other sides, I then have 3/8" + 1/4" (5/8" total) for the margin on the signing side, and the signature could be up to 5/8" tall (far larger than I normally sign art works; my typical signature is probably no more than 3/8"). I'm not sure what everyone else does, but I would not allow an extra 3/4". Perhaps that's just a matter of taste, but it might help explain why some list members seem to think that a signature on the front would detract from the image. It certainly could, if it's that large and visible, or with the margin itself that much larger on one side. Walt
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re:signing
2005-02-28 by Walt Farrell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.