--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "jimpegoda" <pegoda@c...> wrote: > Hi Jim, I like the term Carbon Ink Print. It's cleaner sounding and accurate. The term Carbon Pigment Print has a very harsh, clunky sound. > Hi, > I just set up my UT2 system recently and am having good results. I > am about to enter a few prints in a juried exhibition which some of > you may be interested in called the Northwest Eye. Would love to > have some competition from fellow group members. > > http://humboldtarts.org/exhibitions/nweye/ > > Anyway, I've been involved in few shows with my color work (UC color > on a 2200) and just called the prints Archival Pigment Prints. I > searched the archives and found a lively discussion back in August > concerning the naming of digital black and white prints. It didn't > seem like a consensus was reached but names like Carbon Ink Print > and Carbon Pigment Print along with variations of these names were > mentioned often. At this point I'll probably just call them Carbon > Pigment Ink Prints since that seems to describe the UT2 inks. Any > feedback here from people showing and selling prints made with MIS > products? > > Jim
Message
Re: naming these things revived
2005-03-02 by steveh0607
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.