On 3/8/05 12:22 AM, "Anthony G. Atkielski" sent the following verbage: > > Carolyn Frayn writes: > >> Your statement is nonsense. > > Well, now that you've told me that, I guess I can disregard all the > years of observation upon which it is based. I apologize for that remark as it stands above.. But not the reason behind it. You lumped an entire user base into two categories. I think of my computers as tools, and I upgrade, and I produce, I don't spend all my time tinkering.. I took exception to your absolutism. I could not produce what I do now if I was back on my little mac when first introduced to my graphic arts division... I could not work as I do now back on the DOS systems I used to debug for the sister end of same company. As for Photoshop and older computer systems... gone are the days of having a smoke while an image did a little rotate... Applying corrections or elements and saving every iteration in case I have to go back... Creating alpha channels to mask, and most recently, jumping back and forth between 8 and 16 bit images to correct them. I've had a few years of observations myself. I turned my commodore 64 monitor into a tv, it was still useful, the computer? No. I realize you are not referring to these old methods, but your statement seemed to relate a total negative stance on any developments. > >> Never have I come across a business that is any farther >> behind in upgrades to PS than one version. > > A lot of people think they _have_ to upgrade, and so they do, and > software vendors cheerfully cash the checks. Sure they do, and I cheerfully give them my money if the upgrade is in keeping with my own workflow needs... They created something, I choose to use it, therefore I'll pay for it, just like others pay me when I create something. Sure there are upgrades not worth the cost, I can't remember, but one I passed by in the PS line. If you are producing what you wish in PS5.5, and have no need to upgrade for a reason, then cool. If you are happy with your older smaller slower systems, then cool. I remember PS5 being a great leap from my previous versions. But I also remember how slow it all was. I believe this stuff advances faster than anything before it... I agree it's sometimes either hard to keep up or not worthwhile to some. But there are no absolutes. > >> Equipment changes, software advances change things, and our work flows >> are better off for it... > > That is only occasionally true. Upgrades are a significant cost center > that doesn't always bring with it compensatory savings or increases in > revenue. > For me personally, the last two years of upgrades has given me a very significant time savings.. And that in turn increases revenue. On top of that, what I produce is more satisfying, I have the control I desire. Choice, not conspiracy. Can't imagine saving my 2Gig files to floppies either :) Another great leap for me, PS Large Document Format file saving.. Yahoo. Anyway, 'nuff of this, time to get back to work, got my eye on a sight laser 10" compound mitre saw... More consumerist nonsense I'm sure. Sorry to bore the rest of you. Carolyn
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: I don't know a justification for CS in real photography
2005-03-08 by Carolyn Frayn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.