I do some C8x BW printing also. But, I think the answer to use carts instead of CFS in a 2200 is the extra cartridges give more options than our 4-bangers. I see these folks swapping warm and cool carts in to change the overall tones with much more control. I think if one got a "lock" on ink placement --whether it was a mix of color tones or not-- and decided it was the SOLE way to print forever, CFS on the 2200 makes sense. Seth ==-----Original Message----- ==From: Kip Babington [mailto:cbabing3@...] == ==nonetheless. But now that they have clear cartridges ==available I'd probably go with them - keep a full set on the ==shelf and one in the printer and swap as needed. That would ==also let me swap in a PK cartridge if I wanted to print a few ==glossies, something I can't do with the CFS. == ==If you're going to be doing a lot of printing on a continuous ==basis, the CFS certainly is convenient. But unless the 2200 ==cartridges are somehow more difficult to deal with than the ==C84 models, I'd be inclined to think pretty hard about ==refilling cartridges instead of using the CFS. == ==Cheers, ==Kip == ==Jon Witsell wrote: == ==>I'm thinking of getting the CFS from MIS for my 2200 (w/Ultratones). ==>Can anyone tell me what, if any, issues you have had with yours? ==>
Message
RE: [Digital BW] MIS CFS, any users?
2005-03-09 by Seth
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.