Digital BW, The Print

Personally, I think they're all full of crap!!

This may be out of date by now, but download it for a good background:
http://www.rit.edu/~661www1/sub_pages/consumerguide.pdf

At least RIT doesn't allow the test result used as part of commercial
advertising, so they seem more credible to me.

Seth

==-----Original Message-----
==From: Bob Frost [mailto:bob@...] 

==
==I seem to remember reading that Kodak only uses 1/4 of the 
==light in its fade tests (compared with Wilhelm tests), so if 
==that is so, it is not surprising that Kodak prints last far longer!!
==
==----- Original Message -----
==From: "GJ Kunze" <Colaidian@...>
==
==
==
==Isn't the Kodak Professional Lustre a little better with the 
==bronzing issue? 
==Kodak claims a lifetime longevity, while Ilford claims 10 years.
==