Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Let's simplify nomenclature

2005-03-11 by Djon

Steve, there's no universal dislike for glossy. 

Many on this forum personally find it attractive...and like it or not,
many MUST use glossy for certain clients (eg model headshots, band
publicity,  press kits etc. 

I think it's worthwhile to remember that some printers, the
essentially-discontinued 1280 and the still-current 2200 and 4000 for
example, are simply not built for glossy printing, though obviously
some folks work hard to produce glossy with them. 

Happily there are alternative printers that are designed for glossy,
...they make glop interesting but ultimately not very worthwhile,
especially since glop doesn't help the printers do the job for which
they were designed (color and/or B&W). 


<stevekale@b...> wrote:
> 
> While we are at it let's define RC paper in its INKJET form.  This
is after all a digital print 
> forum...  At least over the last two years this has meant resin
coated "photo" inkjet paper 
> encompassing all glossy, semi-gloss and semi-matte inkjet paper. 
Not to be confused 
> with the wet darkroom paper of similar name which everyone seems to
dislike.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.