Steve, there's no universal dislike for glossy. Many on this forum personally find it attractive...and like it or not, many MUST use glossy for certain clients (eg model headshots, band publicity, press kits etc. I think it's worthwhile to remember that some printers, the essentially-discontinued 1280 and the still-current 2200 and 4000 for example, are simply not built for glossy printing, though obviously some folks work hard to produce glossy with them. Happily there are alternative printers that are designed for glossy, ...they make glop interesting but ultimately not very worthwhile, especially since glop doesn't help the printers do the job for which they were designed (color and/or B&W). <stevekale@b...> wrote: > > While we are at it let's define RC paper in its INKJET form. This is after all a digital print > forum... At least over the last two years this has meant resin coated "photo" inkjet paper > encompassing all glossy, semi-gloss and semi-matte inkjet paper. Not to be confused > with the wet darkroom paper of similar name which everyone seems to dislike.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Let's simplify nomenclature
2005-03-11 by Djon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.