Perhaps I lack the eye or the standards of others here or maybe I need to > see more prints by people who are better printers than I am but FWIW I've > been completely satisfied with the blacks I get using matte papers and Eboni > black ink with QTR and my 2200. I don't know who it was who first said that > we don't need the blackest possible black, all we need is a convincing black > but I certainly agree. Hmm, some good obervations/thoughts to the original post. I for one have decided to set aside this need for higher DMax, at least for now - and go back to making prints which have satisfied me just fine. Epson velvet Fine Art is a current favorite. Perhaps I could make the prints on a non-glossy RC paper like Epson Semi-Matte, or such. But I have lost the urge anymore. I still remember the first time I held a well made b/w inkjet print (from one of the founders of this forum - Martin Wesley). It was on 308 gsm Photo Rag. It elicited an almost orgiastic response in me; the tonality, detail, and most importantly the tactile feel of the paper. William Turner has a similar effect on me. Yet a few of the people I have shown/asked to hold prints made on these venerable papers have reacted "what sort of cardboard is this"!! Just goes to show you that there is no accounting for personal taste and preference. Regards. Shilesh
Message
Re: [Digital BW] DMax and Glossy Prints - Are We Kidding Ourselves?
2005-03-11 by Shilesh Jani
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.