Steve Kale writes: > Please...film is already dead for most (particularly time sensitive) > professional environments. Not _particularly_ time-sensitive, but _primarily_ time-sensitive. If you don't have time constraints, it's much, much harder to justify digital photography. The best photographs are still taken on film. The fact that some professionals are more concerned with making a fast buck than with producing the best possible images doesn't mean that they are a model for others to follow. And certainly amateur photographers in particular need not sacrifice quality. > I don't know a single fashion photographer that > still shoots film and I suspect that the conversion in pro sports > photography and in paparazzi is even greater. So? None of these are my heroes.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Contax is not so toast !
2005-03-16 by Anthony G. Atkielski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.