--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Anthony G. Atkielski" <anthony@a...> wrote: > Andy Graham writes: > > > just out of curiousity......what "principles" would you be speaking > > of? > > How about principles like these: > > http://www.gigapxl.org/gallery-SanDiegoNight.htm > > A single shot on film with four _billion_ pixels. In a panorama of the > San Diego skyline, you can see individual lampshades inside rooms at the > hotels along the beach. I'd love to see a twenty-foot-wide Duratrans of > this image! oh,..you mean the "bigger is better" "principles"?~s~....so,it is NOT the image...it's how big you can blow it up? > > An article in Wired today brags about a camera made with a scanning > digital back that produces 144 megapixels. Unfortunately, that's 40 > times smaller than the film image pointed to above. And the digital > image requires exposures lasting for minutes, whereas the film camera > does it all in one brief exposure. > > Yup, I think I'll be shooting film for quite a bit longer!
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Contax is not so toast !
2005-03-16 by Andy Graham
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.