Anthony, > The resolution of digital is lower than that of film. > Film has better S/N for equivalent resolution. > Digital has more trouble with dynamic range than film, although this is largely an implementation problem. If your above statements are true, would you please explain why Roger Clark's measurements are all wrong. http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/scandetail.html#ExampleImageDetail http://clarkvision.com/imagedetail/digital.signal.to.noise/ http://clarkvision.com/imagedetail/dynamicrange2/ His experiments seem reasonable to me. Bob Frost. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony G. Atkielski" <anthony@...>
Message
Re: [Digital BW] the contax toast/film thingy
2005-03-17 by Bob Frost